Ablyazov Saratov Biography

Marjani hotly argued about the son of Genghis Khan, the Horde and Political School “The Homeland begins with those that speak of the political minimum. You are not the first and not the last to use the political dummy to justify that the Tatars did not come here a huge mass of people. We came here a huge horde! Here they again discussed the origin of the Tatar nation - did it go from the Bulgar, Tatars from the Mongol steppes or was it “squeezed out” to these lands by Genghis Khan by the Genghis Khan?

The essence of the theory of the appearance of the ethnonym “Tatars” according to the famous figure of the Tatar world from Saratov and theses of his opponents are in the report “Business Online”. On the right, the photo is a candidate of historical sciences, a member of the Scientific Council on the Tatarovania of the Saratov Branch of the Institute of Kamil Ablyazov Photo: “Business Online” ”“ ...

historians from Tatarstan said that we, Tatars, destroyed us in some century ”Real sparks flew in all directions the day before during the discussion at the Institute. Marjani Academy of RT, because there is nothing more fundamental for Tatar historians than a discussion of the origin of the Tatars themselves. The degree of tension did not prevent a degree of tension on a round table called “ethnonym Tatars”, even an abundance of names and terms, which are understandable only to scientific husbands themselves.

The main character of the event was the entrepreneur from Saratov, the philanthropist, the founder of the All -Russian Society of Tatar local historians and the author of the two -volume Tatars, Kamil Ablyazov, widely known in the Tatar world, Kamil Ablyazov. He had to express his point of view regarding the origin of the Tatars, and then argue with the respected “Marjanists”.

A lot of time has passed since then, I continued to study various sources, setting myself the goal of finding what caused deaf irritation-when historians from Tatarstan said that we, Tatars, destroyed us in some century. ” Apparently, the speaker had in mind the well -known version that the word “Tatars” came to us thanks to the name of the Turkic tribe, who lived in due time next to the Mongols and exterminated by Genghis Khan.

Ablyazov is inclined to the fact that the Tatar language, t. According to the philanthropist, then the Turkic language was one for all nomads, including for Tabgachi, whose dynasty lasted almost to the Sui dynasty, up to a year. Further, the speaker noted that the Zhuzhan Kaganat, who replaced the Syanbian power, was a normal state education and lasted years, although some, including Tatar historians, present them as robbers.

The Khan Tatar was the head. This is almost the years before the official inscription on Runika, ”the scientist added. Ablyazov was inclined to the fact that the Tatar language, because his theory is built on the fact that the Tatars, to which he refers to both the Naimanov and the Mongols, were squeezed out by the Great Khan of the Mongol Empire in the Kimak Kaganate, which at that time was in contact with the Karakhanid state, and it was the Tatars of this state that was the first to take Islam.

Further, Ablyazov suggests that Genghis Khan gave the Tatars to his eldest son, and due to his origin, the main reason for challenge to Genghis Khan is the capture of the tribe of the Merkitov wife Borte, who gave birth to her firstborn immediately after liberation, approx. And this mass of Tatars moves to the conquest of Russia, ”continued Ablyazov. In these places, not a single brick was found, not a single dugout as the mention of some Khazar city that supposedly stood there.

And there was no one along the banks of the Volga when we came here. The first brick city was Tatar. Juchi troops and subsequently Batu by 70 percent were not coming and not hired, as foreign historians try to impose on us. These were our troops-the Tatar-Nogai Horde! Marjani is their scientific research, but for this you need to change "Khuzin to some Tatar and the thinking of the entire institute." However, it remained incomprehensible, which specifically did not please the famous archaeologist Fayaz Khuzin.

And one of the participants in the round table modestly noted that he even works in another academic institution, the Institute of Archeology. Because if you burst out between two chairs - either with him, or with us, you will not write the story of the Tatars, ”retorted Kamil Alimovich. Ablyazov suggests that Genghis Khan gave the eldest son Juchi Tatars because of his origin photo: Wikimedia.

Iskander Izmailov, whom the speaker “pressed” several times during his speech, entered into the discussion. Iskander Lerunovich asked how to divide the mention of the ethnonym Tatars in Chinese sources from the terms that are exo -ethnomatic names of ethnonyms that the local population does not use - approx. How to divide them? These searches will not lead to anything good.

To show the depth of the mind that you know how to delve is useless. This is the already completed stage. Are there any more questions, better? However, the speaker was not at a loss and began to say that it is now important to provide the young generation with a clear, formatted movement of the ethnonym Tatars until today, and the rest, in fact, husk.Then he asked to pay attention to the bookcase, where the 7-volume “History of the Tatars” of the authorship of the institute named after Marjani, and began to impose those present on the subject of the one who read these books ...

"Tatars" for about 1.6 thousand years, according to Chinese sources, "Photo: Anvar saifutdinov, Wikimedia. Usmanov Institute, Ilnur Mirgaleev, conciliatively noted that the formulation of the question is correct-why the term “Tatars”, including “Mongol-Tatars”, began to apply at once. Although, according to him, they, researchers, do not satisfy that scientists add the Mongols to the Tatars.

And this term was transformed from the endo -ethnonym to the Politicum, the name of all citizens who live within the same state or a certain administrative region - approx. I think we will come to the finish line in a couple of years. So far we are working in Arabic, Persian, Latin sources. There is already a certain understanding, ”Mirgaleev noted. However, the main "Golden Horde" of the Institute of History went from Ablyazov.

To which Mirgaleev replied that once Azerbaijanis called the Tatars, there was a great Tartaria, and then the Tatar nation itself belonged to the Tatars. It begins with those that speak of politicalism. Further, the dispute again went about Juchi, the son of Genghis Khan, Izmailov intervened again, who concluded that his colleague from Saratov was appealing by approximate data, while history demands accuracy, and the same Kimak Kaganate did not exist anymore before the birth of Juichi.

You make us some complaints that we do not know, this is ... ”But Ablyazov was also adamant-the concept of“ Politonim ”cannot be applied with regard to the Tatars. According to Iskander Lerunovich, there are two points of view on the origin of the Tatars in the territory of the current republic. The first indicates that the Tatars came from the Bulgarian, the second point of view is based on the fact that the Tatars came from the Tatars, which came from the Mongolian steppes and destroyed all the Bulgarians, taking their settlements photo: “business online” “Over the past years, they didn’t get Tatar”, then I asked Izmailov to take out his theory of how the Tatars were on the territory of the current republics.

The latter spoke about the two points of view, well known to the Tatars of interest in the history. The first indicates that the Tatars came from the Bulgarian: in the era of the Bulgarian state, a certain nationality formed, having clear ethnographic parameters, self -awareness, culture, and adhered to Islam. The population, despite the fact that it became part of the future Golden Horde, continued to be Bulgars.

But the Bolsheviks in the year instead of calling the territory to be called the Bulgarian Republic, they called the Tatar. The second point of view is based on the fact that the Tatars came from the Tatars, which came from the Mongol steppes and destroyed all the Bulgarians, occupied their settlements, borrowed their language, culture, customs, and here everyone became Tatars.

However, this position of Izmailov, as well as his longtime associate of Damir Ishakov, is well known, the modern understanding of ethnic processes does not fit exclusively into a mechanical phenomenon. That is, in the processes of self -awareness, the spread of cultural mechanisms, mechanisms for the transfer of consciousness, there is a spread of ideas about itself. Often, ideas about unity are invented or, as historians say, imagined.

For example, the idea that Russians and Ukrainians are one people are the imagination of the Slavophiles of the 19th century. ” Ilnur Mirgaleev instructed that the history of terms and the history of ethnic processes should be considered separately, since the Tatars were not always called the Tatars photos: “business online” Izmailov is confident that attempts to construct different nations into a single nation did not lead to anything good, with the exception of the German nation.

We understand when this term arose, what is its nature, what the author had cultural codes that allowed him to write this or that word in this source. This is the source studio method, ”the expert summed up and added that simple mechanisms proposed by Ablyazov - the already passed stage. Mirgaleev instructed that the history of terms and the history of ethnic processes should be considered separately, since the Tatars were not always called Tatars.

In the end, the role of the cat Leopold was tried on by the head of the Committee for Work with the Tatar entrepreneurs of the Executive Committee of VKT Farit Urazaev. He announced the need to take into account all opinions, because "over the past years of whom only the Tatars have not called." According to him, this topic is poorly studied and each time we stumble about it.

And the fact that the hero of the evening as a representative of another region has his own vision is very good. It was a huge state with about 2-3 million people almost 80 percent of them were the Tatars that Genghis Khan gave to his son Juchi, ”Ablyazov summed up his position in a conversation with Business Online.