Biography of Bururdelov judges

The orderlies led the defendant from the courtroom in a nationwide shirt.

The mother of three children achieves from the former spouse of alimony for her own maintenance. All this is excerpts from the scripts of television shows. Judicial programs, which were watched by families in the "zero", are again gaining popularity on the Internet: fragments of the show are cut out and actively laid out on the network. True, now they fall into the category of "memes".

What such programs are clinging to and why they continue to be actively promoting them, despite the criticism of the professional community, the “sphere” sorted out. 7 minutes The editorial board of the portal Sphere "Murzik, well, we have broken up for a long time. Say thank you for not putting it up! By the plot, the applicant went to court to get from the ex -girlfriend of non -pecuniary damage in thousands of rubles and the return of the money that he spent on plastic surgery to become a cat, Judge Nikolai Burdelov.

The plaintiff demonstrates his old photos, the plaintiff, demonstrates his old photographs, Affirming that two years ago he was a normal person. The girl at that time dreamed of becoming a popular blogger and persuaded the plaintiff to do plastic surgery so that his face resembles a cat's face, and she used it to create content. The plaintiff claims that the girl forced him to lie under the surgeon’s knife, and the defendant claims that the man himself wanted to try on the role of the animal and even walked around the house on all fours.

As evidence, each side uses videos filmed on the phone. Burdelov decides to refuse to satisfy the claim, referring to the fact that the plaintiff, at his own request, decided to become a cat. The program came out in the year. Over the past 20 years, the authors of the judicial show not only did not listen to the professional community, which insisted on adapting the programs to real meetings, but on the contrary, made them even more absurd.

So, in one of the issues of the same show, the plaintiff came up with a cunning signal for secret meetings with his mistress: he put on a room plant on the window, notifying that there was no one at home. But once the brother of adultery burst into the apartment and brutally beat him. A relative decided that his wife is his brother’s mistress. The plaintiff demanded compensation from the defendant for the beatings.

As evidence, the brothers brought the Kashpo and the same indoor plant as evidence. As is usually the case in such programs, they began for health, and first the participants in the meeting arranged a verbal skirmish using non -normative vocabulary, and then began to beat each other. After the phrase "eat the land now, cattle" abandoned by the defendant, he is finally taken out of the hall.

At the same time, the judge simply silently watches what is happening. And who are the judges? It is known that at first real affairs were taken as the basis for issues, but they changed names and personal facts. The viewer had the opportunity to feel like a part of the trial, to understand how it is arranged, and to learn elementary legal norms. However, the creators of the show quickly realized that with dry sentences from the human codes at the TV screen could not be kept.

So fights, inappropriate statements, dubious verdicts and multiple distortions appeared on the air. Fact: people who have a real attitude to the system are almost always involved as judges in such programs. These are former and current lawyers, and teachers of law universities, and retired judges. For example, Nikolai Burdelov, known for the Judicial Passion show, is the deputy chairman of the Bar Association of the Guild of Moscow Lawyers and has real practice.

Spectators seriously discuss the competence of judges and evaluate the decisions they made. The following is written about Burudelov in social networks: "Democratic and fair! Giving with his participation it is extremely unpleasant to watch. Personal hostility and personal opinion are mixed everywhere." It was not always agreed with his decisions, but he undoubtedly very gifted.

"Most of the audience believe that the judges at the show behave at real meetings just as well. Moreover, people get the impression that the whole process is arranged as shown on the screen. However, the current lawyers see a huge problem in this. And this, of course, negatively affects the work. Therefore, the legal subsequence of the population in this case. If it rises, it is minimal.

Another big minus of such a show is the shocking behavior of the participants. In real trials, it also occurs, but not in such volumes. The real judge will never say “morons and morons”, ”says Tatyana Chumikova, lawyer in the field of IT, medicine, and contractual law. Citizens form a stereotype that in court you can behave similarly: raise their voice, allow insults, etc.

However, according to the expert, such“ performances ”are always suppressed in court processes, moreover, they can be fined or deduced from the order of the order or deduced from the order The court of the American tracing paper.For example, Judge Judy’s program “Judge Judy” and some others work on the principle of arbitration in the Nerossian sense of the word, that is, the arbitration court.

This means that the parties conclude an agreement under which the judge’s decision will be mandatory for them. At first, real people with real problems participated in American programs and the programs were exclusively educational in nature. Only decades later, scriptwriters and actors appeared in them. In Russia, a boom of such shows falls at the beginning of the x.

The first was the “Court of Court” program, which was broadcast on the NTV channel from a year. The pilot release was held by Vladimir Voroshilov. This was the only program in the history of Russian television that depicted consideration of real criminal cases and never resorted to production. In the role of the judge, lawyer Pavel Astakhov, who was wider fame, acted precisely thanks to this program.

She went out exactly 10 years and during this time she deserved a lot of criticism. Some legal sites even collected blunders allowed by the creators of the show for the specified period. For example, up to a year, criminal cases on the show were examined with violation of the norms of the Code of Criminal Procedure: a lawyer who representing the interests of the victim was absent in the hall, they neglected the judicial debate, and the defendant was refused in the last word.

Sometimes the judge announced the sentence sitting, the participants in the process carried pistols into the hall, the bailiff was called the "guard", and the prosecutors were injured and beaten. We will do without listing distorted articles - there were too many of them. The "zero" for the audience of the program even created a free legal consultation, books were published, where the examples of specific cases explained which documents must be submitted to the court.

Pavel Astakhov then said that during the release in real time, six lawyers responded to the calls of the audience. On the day they managed to advise on average a person. This is one of the models of justice. In particular, we show the arbitration court when the two parties agreed that they would come to the third and she would judge them. The arbitration court does not work like that, we are not distorting his activities, ”said a countless number in Russia in an interview with Astachi.

A countless number is in Russia. One day on two different channels from Monday to Friday, the“ Court of Federal Judge ”is broadcast by the first channel. The first is focused mainly on civil matters, the second on criminal. channels "Mir" and "Home". They still have enough fans, but also much more critics than before. For example, larger federal channels refused to be court programs.

However, anxious feelings are popular with these programs on the Internet, where the new generation already observes impulsive and unfair judges, freaks in the image of animals and other farce inappropriate in this court.